Thanks for Your Donations
-
Wich PS3 is the good one??
I have got a question, wich PS3 is the better one.
PS3 Fat or PS3 SLIM
-
my ps3 SLIM 320 GB 3.55 kmeaw is really good
fat is older model than slim, take SLIM !
-
really, that depends on what you want out of your system. Slim's are less prone to breaking down, but some of the fats can play ps2 games. Your choice, really.
Don't get Pwnied.
-
Slim all the way. Newer tech, less prone to breaking down on you. The only advantage of the old fat consoles is as someone said above, they play PS2 games, but don't even consider choosing which one to buy based on that when you can pick up a 2nd hand PS2 for $20-$30 anyway. I had 2 fats, both of them YLOD on me (the first one in the first 3 months that I had it)
At least a 40gb or 60gb fat is cheap to buy 2nd hand, that's probably the only positive thing they have going for them.
DON'T BELIEVE ANY OF THE 3.6+ CFW BULL$HIT THAT YOU SEE ON YOUTUBE OR READ ON BLOGSPOT
-
Best Ps3 would be a 4 usb ports hardware backward compatible Fat model.
-
pick a slim 320 and mind the firmware if you wanna cook,or else you're fine with whatever slim.
-

+ REP ME IF I WAS HELPFUL:rock:
-
I agree with yyup.... I myself have the FAT 60GB CECH-A Backwards Compatible(With 4 USB Ports) PS3 for about 4 - 5 years now and nothing's ever happened to it.
Moreover I feel that the FAT PS3 looks better than the SLIM one. Plus the SLIM PS3 has Buttons (which actually goes "click") for the ON/OFF and Eject button while the FAT PS3 has touch sensitive buttons....
Last edited by advaithk; 20th January 2012 at 11:22 AM.
-
got a 40gb ps3,bought in 2008. i am suprise it is still running with no signs of ylod. also got a new slim in nov and sounds louder than my fat.
-
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules