Xbox 360
I use PS3 for backups and Xbox360 to play online. So hmmmmm ill have to say PS3 you dont have to waste money on disks and im a loyal PS3 fan. Plus there isnt that many games worth playing online, thats just my opinion. PS3! PS3! PS3! PS3!
Please +Rep if I help/inform
Xbox 360
PS3. Been a ps3 fan since PS1. and still at it. I do have
a 360 though that got banned so I use that to play games
like portal 2 that I can't play on the PS3
But yea PS3 all the way![]()
Both Consoles have power, but PS3 is much powerful as xbox,
only different is that Developer need to understand ps3 architecture to develop games unlike xbox has much similar structure as PC
My Vote for PS3, I hope there are some nice developer which understand PS3 power like naughty dogs, Sony obviously, and Gorilla developers, and Darksider game developer.
PS3 Rocks
Both consoles are great, but the PS3 is a more complete experience with regards to cutting edge entertainment. 360 has no HD video, the online component comes with a ridiculous code of conduct, the graphics don't seem as detailed as those for most ps3 titles, pay for play is just weak-sauce, and Microsoft doesn't seem as competitive with the console exclusives as they used to be. Love my 360 but prefer my PS3. I also think kinect has too many flaws to even be compared to wii-motion plus or Move. Just an overly elaborate opinion though...:thefinger:
Pillage the village, rape the sheep....... steal the women? ( . Y . )
xbox 360 all the way. heck i have jb ps3 and i still dont use it as much as my xbox
I like both equally but I still play the 360 a lot more. I do like the controllers better on the 360.
As far as what I like best though is my gaming pc over either consoles even though I use the consoles a lot more the gaming experience on my pc blows the consoles away.Razor mouse,Sound Blaster,and 580 Gtx ,Logitech 5500 sound system on my I7 makes the gaming experience really intense.
Both consoles (not counting slims) are pre 2006 technology which is basically a dinosour in pc terms. Even so the consoles are better for convienience and amount of games.
The Kinect may have flaws but no way is the Move or Wii-motion better in any way.The Kinect technology is the future. Its already being applied to so many fields its crazy. It is being incorporated into the medical field so when doctors are in surgery they dont have to do anything but motion their hands to use machines.It lessons the chances of bacterial infections plus allows the doctor to do more things in less time.
The Kinect is the first step towards future mass production of what was previously seen only in science fiction. Having control of everything just by moving your hands.No way will someone want to carry a wii type device with them everywhere you go.
The Kinect itself not to mention the technology as a whole has way more of a future than the wii or PS3 motion devices.
Before Microsoft purchased the Kinect technology it cost like $20,000 for use of that tech and Microsoft released it for not much over a $150. Genius on their part.
Outside of the sphere of gaming I definitely agree with bloody claws. He/she makes an excellent point. However, to elaborate on my original point, the kinect doesn't respond as quickly as the move with regards to sudden changes in control. This may be due to the games themselves though. It is important to note that without a quality cross-platform title a direct comparison of technical prowess is difficult. In my experience, kinect isn't able to properly distinguish background interference consistently and if anyone in the room moved too close to me it gets confused.
Pillage the village, rape the sheep....... steal the women? ( . Y . )